Scribe Doesn’t Use Sensitivity Readers. Here’s Why.
A viral clip that’s been circulating features author Adam Szetela arguing that “sensitivity readers” are reshaping trade publishing—and not for the better. You can watch it here: Conversations with Coleman – Adam Szetela clip.
Szetela’s new book with MIT Press also lays out his case: That Book Is Dangerous!
Below is a plain-English explainer (what they are, where they came from, who uses them) and Scribe’s stance.
What is a sensitivity reader?
A sensitivity reader is a paid pre-publication reviewer who evaluates a manuscript for potentially offensive or stereotypical portrayals related to particular identities or experiences (race, religion, disability, gender/sexuality, etc.). They provide a report with suggested changes. See The Guardian’s explainer: “Sensitivity readers: what publishing’s most polarising role is really about”.When did the role emerge?
Use of sensitivity reads accelerated in YA (young-adult) publishing in the mid-to-late 2010s, following social-media controversies over representation. Notable flashpoints include:
- Amélie Wen Zhao’s Blood Heir (publication initially pulled in 2019 after online backlash; later revised and released): The Guardian and context on subsequent sensitivity reads: SDSU ChildLit blog
- Kosoko Jackson’s A Place for Wolves (author withdrew the 2019 debut after backlash; Jackson himself had worked as a sensitivity reader)
- Laura Moriarty’s American Heart (2017 controversy over representation): overview of the Kirkus review reversal and sensitivity-reader debate: Why Evolution Is True.
Who uses them?
There’s no single industry-wide policy, but the practice is common at major houses and among literary estates, used case-by-case:
- Penguin Random House (Puffin) commissioned sensitivity readers for Roald Dahl edits (2023)
- HarperCollins used sensitivity readers for Agatha Christie reissues (2023)
- Ian Fleming Publications (rights holder for James Bond) commissioned sensitivity readers for Bond reissues (2023)
- Picador (Pan Macmillan UK) planned a sensitivity-read revision of Kate Clanchy’s memoir amid controversy (2021–2022)
- Hachette (Children’s) has publicly discussed “sensitive text revisions”/reviewing legacy children’s works (e.g. Enid Blyton lines) for appropriateness
Against sensitivity readers
We’re for editing. We’re for accuracy. We’re for readers. We’re not for sensitivity readers.-
Identity ≠ editorial expertise
-
It chills risk and texture
-
It confuses craft problems with content taboos
- It can become risk-management theater
- The better safeguard is the market of readers
What we do instead
- Author freedom. You control your voice. We won’t launder it through identity vetoes.
- One kind of “censorship.” We won’t let you publish a bad book— one that is rushed, untrue, structurally broken, or lazy on the page. That’s discipline, not ideology.
Ready to Write Your Book?
Scribe has helped 2,000+ authors turn their ideas into published books. Schedule a free consult to get started.
Schedule a Consult